India’s favourable demographics – a myth demystified
Goldman Sachs came out with its
report on BRIC countries (Brazil, Russia, India & China) in early 2000s.
And what a lovely timing - as during the decade India’s GDP growth rate
increased to high single digits on a consistent basis. No wonder, we (Indians)
assumed a high GDP growth rate as our birth right. Lots of reasons have been
cited for the same – rising working population, increasing income levels,
opening up of economy, rising expenditure levels driven by higher aspirations
of urban youth, etc. etc. – with favourable demographics being the driving
force behind most of them.
The question is – is it fair to
assume high GDP growth rate our birth right, just because we have a rising
population, most of which will be entering the age of employment in the coming
years? Not a bad assumption. After all, history supports this argument.
However, I want to highlight a
few reasons, why the same reason – favourable demographics – can be a curse for
India.
1.
First and foremost, a rising young population
requires employment. However, the policy paralysis at the centre has just
destroyed the economic sentiment. RBI in its latest policy document has
indicated collapse in investment cycle as a key worry for India. International
rating agencies S&P and Fitch have already lowered outlook on India to negative
(from Stable earlier) citing similar reasons. Remember, unless we are able to
generate employment opportunities, we are not going to witness rising income
levels, expenditures, etc.
2.
Furthermore, while we may or may not be able to
generate employment leading to higher output (supply in economics terms), the
increasing population will have its basic needs – food water and shelter.
Basics of all economics – low supply and high demand – welcome to the world of
higher inflation and this time a persistent one.
3.
Recently, during the state elections in UP, election
candidates announced free laptops for all students passing class X. No doubt,
it is a good step to increase education levels in the state. I do appreciate
it. However, I wonder, if they have even bothered to think (forget analyse) how
they are going to finance such a high cost – especially, with rising
population, the no. of candidates eligible for free laptops, is only going to
rise. The fiscal deficit (higher expenditure than revenue) for most states is
already quite high. Furthermore, as I mentioned above, the employment crisis
will only aggravate the problem.
4.
With higher no. of educated youth chasing the
smaller no. of employment opportunities, it will lead to the jungle rule –
survival of the fittest. While it sounds good from the economic view point of
the companies, we need to keep in mind that we live in a socialistic
environment – taking care of everybody, and not just the best. Also, while
others may not be the best in India, it does not mean that they are incapable.
However, the economic conditions in India may just not be supportive enough to
allow them to earn their livelihood. And these people can just be anyone – you,
me, our friends, our relatives or our next door neighbours. Are we ready for
this situation?
5.
With lesser employment opportunities available,
people will get attracted to short-cuts (breeding more corruption in the
system) and unethical means to earn livelihood. A moral dilemma – as while
earning via unethical means is wrong, everyone does have the right to live. So
what do we do?
6.
And I just forgot to mention – above reasons/
situations can also cause social unrest.
There are 2 ways to conclude this
now – listing out the solutions to avoid such a problem. For the moment, I am
adopting the other route – leaving this food for thought for the reader.
